Tunnell v. Wiley
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.
I
Plaintiff artfully attempts to categorize for adjudication as a constitutional issue a problem which does not actually exist on the record of this case. From plaintiff’s vantage he suggests that he has raised the following issue:
Does he have the right to collect civil damages under the Federal Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983) by reason of pretrial newspaper publicity which could purportedly deprive him of an impartial jury trial in a forthcoming criminal ease where he would be a defendant ?
Plaintiff attempts to cast this case as if the record…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jack Burton Tunnell v. Doris Wiley and Richard Sprague, First Asst. District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Burgess v. RothDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Johnson v. County of ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- United States Ex Rel. Vitoratos v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
- Kercsmar v. Pen Argyl Area School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.