Legal Opinion

Tunnell v. Wiley

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-31PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.

I

Plaintiff artfully attempts to categorize for adjudication as a constitutional issue a problem which does not actually exist on the record of this case. From plaintiff’s vantage he suggests that he has raised the following issue:

Does he have the right to collect civil damages under the Federal Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983) by reason of pretrial newspaper publicity which could purportedly deprive him of an impartial jury trial in a forthcoming criminal ease where he would be a defendant ?

Plaintiff attempts to cast this case as if the record…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jack Burton Tunnell v. Doris Wiley and Richard Sprague, First Asst. District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  2. Burgess v. RothDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Johnson v. County of ChesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. United States Ex Rel. Vitoratos v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
  5. Kercsmar v. Pen Argyl Area School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API