Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Tacoma-Ashford Transit Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1932No. 24033. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The defendant presented an answer which contained three affirmative defenses and a cross-complaint. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $2,500. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial being made and overruled, judgment was entered, from which the defendant appeals.

The facts, which will present the question to be determined upon this appeal, may be stated as follows: The appellant, Tacoma-Ashford Transit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Nofsinger v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Shoemaker v. Bryant Lumber & Shingle Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Foley v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Pearson v. Federal Mining & Smelting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cummins v. DufaultWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Heinlen v. Martin Miller Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Blanco v. Sun Ranches, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API