Legal Opinion

People v. Mau

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 29, 1980No. 80-107PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stouder

Appealing from his conviction, following a jury trial, for armed robbery and the consequent sentence of six years, the minimum sentence prescribed for armed robbery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 38, pars. 18—2 (b), 1005—8—1 (a) (3)), the defendant, Ronald Mau, raises two issues for our consideration. The first is whether, in order to mitigate the allegedly unduly harsh sentence, this court should reduce the degree of the offense.

A court of review, however, will not reduce the degree of offense purely out of merciful benevolence. There must exist some evidentiary weakness upon which the court can…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. People v. HoustonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. People v. CantrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. People v. BoucherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. ShumateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. People v. BaesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. People v. MeadowsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. People v. KickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. People v. MundayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API