Beach v. Bird & Wells Lumber Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Mari-nette county: S. D. HastiNgs, Circuit Judge. Among other references upon the part of the appellant were tbe following: Sweet v. Ohio 0. Co. 18 Wis. 127, 47 N. W. 182; Faber v. C. Beíss C. Co. 124 Wis. 554, 102 N. W. 1049; Albrecht v. C. & N. W. R. Co. 108 Wis. 530, 84 N. W. 882; Kerrigan, v. C., M. & St. P. R. Co. 104 Wis. 166, 80 N. W. 586; 2 Words & Phrases, 1319; McKivergam v. Alexander & K. L. Co. 124 Wis. 60, 102 N.…
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Mari-nette county: S. D. HastiNgs, Circuit Judge. Among other references upon the part of the appellant were tbe following: Sweet v. Ohio 0. Co. 18 Wis. 127, 47 N. W. 182; Faber v. C. Beíss C. Co. 124 Wis. 554, 102 N. W. 1049; Albrecht v. C. & N. W. R. Co. 108 Wis. 530, 84 N. W. 882; Kerrigan, v. C., M. & St. P. R. Co. 104 Wis. 166, 80 N. W. 586; 2 Words & Phrases, 1319; McKivergam v. Alexander & K. L. Co. 124 Wis. 60, 102 N. W. 332; Mac-Carthy v. Whitcomb, 110 Wis. 113, 85 N. W. 707; Smith v. Q., M. -& St. P. R. Co. 91 Wis. 503, 65 N. W. 183;…
1Opinion of the Court
TimltN, T.
Tbe defendant owns and operates a line of railroad in Marinette county in connection witb its logging and lumbering business, and bas for some time and to a limited extent been carrying freight and passengers for bire on said railroad. Tbe plaintiff was employed by defendant and acting as brakeman. On July 18, 1906, tbe footboard and bandbold upon tbe engine tender of one of defendant’s locomotives were damaged and broken in an accident. Tbe plaintiff requested Mr. Hollenbeck, superintendent of defendant having authority to bire and discharge, to have tbe handholds repaired. Tbe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baxter v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Brabbits v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Heimlich v. TaborWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Grams v. C. Reiss Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Wedgwood v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Henderson v. DreyfusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
- Secard v. Rhinelander Lighting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Carpenter v. Village of DickeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Lehner v. Berlin Publishing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.