Legal Opinion
State v. Fudge
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided May 17, 2001No. 03-99-00793-CRPublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YEAKEL, Justice.
Appellee James Dean Fudge was charged with driving while intoxicated. See Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 40.04(a) (West Supp.2001). He filed a pretrial motion to suppress contending that the evidence of the offense was discovered during an improper investigative stop. Following a hearing, the county court at law suppressed the evidence and the State appeals. See Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (West Supp.2001). The issue on appeal is whether the police officer lawfully stopped appellee based on unsolicited information given to the officer in a face-to-face manner. We will…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Brother v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Pipkin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- State v. Griffey, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Hawes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Bilyeu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.