White Motor Co. v. Reynolds

This is an action in replevin to recover the possession of two motortrucks mortgaged by Roland Reynolds, the defendant, to The White Motor Company, the plaintiff. The trial court found that the plaintiff was entitled to the possession of the trucks. The defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled and he has appealed. There is no cross-appeal.

There is no bill of exceptions in this case. In the absence of a bill of exceptions it is presumed that the issues of fact presented by the pleadings are established by the evidence and the only issue that is considered on appeal is the sufficiency of…