Legal Opinion

State v. Pakulski

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1990No. 407A89PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The sole question raised on appeal is whether Judge Freeman erred in sentencing the defendants on the charges of felonious breaking or entering and felonious larceny after Judge Fountain had arrested judgment on these charges following a jury verdict of guilty on each. At the trial before Judge Fountain, defendants were convicted of murder in the first degree on the felony murder theory. We hold that Judge Fountain arrested judgment on the breaking or entering charge because it constituted the predicate felony for the conviction of murder in the first degree resulting from the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. FlowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. BarloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. MulderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. BonnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API