Legal Opinion

State v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 12, 1992No. 10-91-03977; CA A72075PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for perjury. ORS 162.065. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. He argues that there was insufficient evidence to convict him. We reverse.

The perjury charge arose from defendant’s testimony during his trial for sodomy committed against his grandchild. The state asked defendant on cross-examination whether he had ever been mean to her. Defendant responded: “I’ve never been mean to any of my kids. My grandkids or my kids, never, neither one. No sir.” During defendant’s perjury trial, the state called four of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API