Legal Opinion
Isenberg v. Woodson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 1933No. Equity No. 57083PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*224MEMORANDUM
LETTS, J.
I conclude that the motion of the defendants to dismiss plaintiff's bill as amended should be denied and I adopt as reasons for my conclusion the analysis of the law as found in the memorandum of Attorney General Jno. G. Sargent in the matter of the application of Paula Volkmann for Executive Allowance, a copy of which memorandum I find in the files of this case. Said Paula Volkmann was the sister of this claimant, and her claim was in all respects similar to that of her brother Richard M. Isenberg, the plaintiff herein.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Washington
Application for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Inglis v. Trustees of Sailor's Snug Harbour in City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- MacKenzie v. HareSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Shanks v. DupontSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Gibson v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Preisler v. Secretary of State of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968