Legal Opinion · Dissent

Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. Guardino

California Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1995No. S036269Published

1DissentLucas, C. J.

I respectfully dissent.

The majority in this case, and in another recent case (Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688 [38 Cal.Rptr.2d 363, 889 P.2d 557]), has seriously undermined the ability of local government to finance sorely needed projects and improvements through local tax measures. In the past, the constitutional prohibition against using the referendum process to annul “tax levies” (Cal. Const., art. II, § 9, subd. (a)) assured that a proposed new tax could not be *262nullified by submitting the tax measure to the voters before it could take effect. In Rossi, however, this court allowed the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Geiger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Los Angeles County Transportation Commission v. RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API