Legal Opinion
Walker v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 2, 2006No. 27A02-0507-CV-596PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
William Walker ("Walker") appeals the trial court's order dismissing his complaint against DaimlerChrysler Corporation ("DaimlerChrysler"), which alleges violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act ("MMWA") and the Indiana Motor Vehicle Protection Act ("Indiana Lemon Law"), and compelling arbitration of those claims. Walker has not satisfied his burden to show us that Congress intended to preclude binding arbitration under the MMWA. We acknowledge that the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") has concluded that the MMWA does not permit binding arbitration, but…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2009