Legal Opinion

Semel v. Gould

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1857PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the District Oourt of West Baton Rouge, Robertson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtVoorhies, J.

The plaintiff, as surviving spouse of the late Gha/rles Semel and natural tutrix of her minor child, Fudora, Semel, sole issue of her marriage with deceased, instituted suit against the defendant, John M. Gould, for the recovery of $800, alleged to be for work done on a road and levee on his land fronting on the Mississippi, under a contract entered into between the deceased and the Police Jury of Pointe Coupee on the 22d of September, 1849, said land being then assessed as the property of Ye/i’bal and Ghamibeo's.

The defendant, Gould, filed an answer setting up various matters of defence,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Firemen's Fond InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State Ex Rel. Wheless Inv. Co. v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Hardaway Contracting Co. v. City of GretnaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API