Legal Opinion
Whittier Redevelopment Agency v. Oceanic Arts
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1995No. B085788PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Plaintiff Whittier Redevelopment Agency commenced eminent domain proceedings to acquire several parcels of land for redevelopment purposes, including parcels in which defendants Oceanic Arts and the Chitjians held leasehold interests. Plaintiff obtained prejudgment possession of the property after depositing the amount of probable compensation as determined by its appraiser.
Following the order awarding prejudgment possession, defendants vacated the property. The buildings they owned were demolished and removed and a shopping center constructed on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Elsea v. SaberiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Bradshaw v. ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Department of Transportation v. ZivelonghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cotton v. City of EurekaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- City of Santa Clarita v. NTS Technical SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Med. Acquisition Co. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Medical Acquisition Company v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018