Legal Opinion

People v. Rutter

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 2006No. B186072PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

A jury convicted John Rutter of attempted grand theft, forgery and perjury. Rutter contends his forgery conviction should be reversed because the prosecution failed to disclose a piece of its evidence in a timely manner. He contends his perjury conviction should be reversed because the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the elements of the crime. We find no merit in these contentions and affirm the judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Before she was Princess Fiona, Mary Jensen or Charlie’s Angel Natalie, Cameron Diaz was a 19-year-old model who on one occasion posed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. HagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. Von TiedemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Blake CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. People v. Figueroa CA5California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API