People v. Rutter
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
A jury convicted John Rutter of attempted grand theft, forgery and perjury. Rutter contends his forgery conviction should be reversed because the prosecution failed to disclose a piece of its evidence in a timely manner. He contends his perjury conviction should be reversed because the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the elements of the crime. We find no merit in these contentions and affirm the judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Before she was Princess Fiona, Mary Jensen or Charlie’s Angel Natalie, Cameron Diaz was a 19-year-old model who on one occasion posed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. HagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. Von TiedemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Blake CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Figueroa CA5California Court of Appeal · 2014