Hill v. the Beach Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, Chief Justice:
Respondent Beach Company owns a rather large area of accreted lands on the Isle of Palms, South Carolina, which lies between the lands of appellants and the ocean front. This controversy arose over appellants’ right to cross the lands of respondent in going to and from the beach. The question for determination is whether the trial judge erred in holding that appellants’ easement of access to the Isle of Palms front beach was limited to certain designated areas of ingress and egress, thereby permitting respondent to develop the intervening area. We affirm.
The facts of this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Epps v. FreemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- State v. Beach Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Schroeder v. O'NeillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Shea v. LesserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Van Blarcum v. City of North Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Blanks v. RawsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Clifford v. Wild Dunes AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Van Blarcum v. City of North Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.