Legal Opinion

Owens v. Moyes

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1995No. 18785PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

Todd J. Owens (“Owens”) appeals from a judgment granting a motion for a directed verdict. We affirm.

FACTS

Owens filed his complaint claiming that Elizabeth M. Moyes (“Moyes”) owed him $11,780 for loans he claims he made to Moyes during the course of their ill-fated relationship. The scant record discloses that following the close of Owens’ case in chief, the trial court directed a verdict of $654.01 for Owens, the sum of money that Moyes agreed that she owed Owens and which was evidenced by written “IOUs.” The trial court concluded that since there was no writing signed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Werner v. Norwest Bank South Dakota, N.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Baltodano v. North Central Health Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Shaw v. GeorgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BuchholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. D. G. v. D. M. K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re the Estate of NeiswenderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Durkee v. Van WellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Koopman v. City of EdgemontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API