Legal Opinion

Seelig v. Brusso

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1960No. 21326PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McBRIDE, Judge.

Plaintiff, who is the holder and owner for value of a promissory note for $1,000, dated September 12, 1955, payable 90 days after date to the “order of ourselves” with interest at 4 per cent per annum, and signed and indorsed by D. James Brusso, Bertram R. Schwartz, and Milton H. Cohen, brought this suit against said parties and also against the corporation known as Stella Homes, Inc., seeking to recover of them in solido the amount of said note; the cause of action stated against said corporation rests on the allegation that it assumed and agreed to pay the obligation of D.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. DaviesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  2. William D. Seymour & Co. v. CastellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Todd v. ShouseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
  4. Read v. WareSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  5. Watkins v. HaydelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  2. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. ShippLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API