Legal Opinion

Charles Patterson, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1965No. 7949_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

In this motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the petitioner attacks his judgment and sentence on a narcotics charge for the legal insufficiency of the indictment. The trial court held the indictment legally sufficient and dismissed the motion without a hearing. We sustain the order of dismissal.

The petitioner contends that the indictment did not sufficiently apprise him of the nature of the offenses charged so that he could properly prepare a defense, nor was it sufficient to enable him to plead the judgment as a bar to any future proceedings which might be brought against him…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arnold George Lauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  2. Clone S. Clay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. Harry Lee DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  4. Ricardo Borroto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. George T. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API