Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Engler v. General Electric Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 31, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

Motion to dismiss amended complaint granted with leave to amend within 20 days.

The plaintiff is an inventor. He appears in personam and is not a lawyer. His original complaint was amended. The amended complaint relates to six patents. One (Engler U.S.Patent No. 1,492,972) is owned by the plaintiff, and the others (Alexanderson U.S.Patents, Nos. 1,993,-581, 1,937,377, 1,939,428, 1,939,429, 1,954,-661) are owned by the defendant.

The amended complaint alleges certain claims with respect to these patents:

1. It seeks a cancellation of the Alexanderson patents for alleged…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Briggs v. United Shoe MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Thiokol Chemical Corp. v. Burlington Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  3. Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1946
  4. Eckert v. BraunDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1945
  5. Zalkind v. ScheinmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API