Legal Opinion

City of Ardmore v. Donham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 1958No. 37882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

Plaintiff, City of Ardmore, filed this action against Roy Donham and Opal Donham, defendants, to condemn a right of way approximately ¼ mile in length and SO feet in width, for a water pipeline along the north side of Section 6, Township 4 South, Range 1 East, in Carter County, Oklahoma.

By reason of a branch or creek aloiig the section line the east-west section line road has moved to the south encroaching upon defendants’ land along the north side of section 6, so that a substantial portion of defendants’ property, as originally described in the petition, is in the present…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irion v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DyeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. WatersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Chelsea Butane Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MinorCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Chelsea Butane Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API