Legal Opinion

Cate v. Good Bros., Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 28, 1950No. 10078_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

The diversity of the citizenship of the parties has made this controversy concerning the sale of quantities of cheese the business of the courts of the United States.

In the district court the plaintiff seller was awarded damages measured by the agreed price of the merchandise under the terms of an alleged contract with the defendant buyer. Judgment was entered pursuant to the answers of a jury to special interrogatories propounded under Rule 49 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

This appeal raises questions concerning the acceptance of part…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Robert T. Clegg v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Hennigan v. Atlantic Refining CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Francis T. Ratigan v. New York Central Railroad Co. v. Interstate Commodities, Inc., and the Troy Union Railroad Company, Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. William Thedorf v. Sam LipseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  5. Warren M. Wilson v. Homestead Valve Manufacturing Company. Appeal of Warren M. Wilson. Appeal of Homestead Valve Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API