Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Hollzer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1934Published

1Per curiam

This is an application for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus directed to Harry A. Hollzer, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, directing him to extend the túne for the settlement of petitioner’s bill of exceptions, and to settle the bill and to extend the term for that purpose if necessary. Petitionin’ alleges that he has been tried and convicted of the crime of conspiracy and forgery in connection with the disposition of certain registered Liberty bonds issued by the United Stai.es government. He claims that, by reason of the ignorance of his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Ingrim v. EppersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Camden Iron Works Co. v. SaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. Stonesifer v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Brown v. PrewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API