Legal Opinion
Nicholas Ribaudo v. R. James Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided January 9, 2007No. 06-2762PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAGEL, Judge:
On September 28, 2006, Nicholas Ribau-do filed a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus wherein he asserts that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary), through the Chairman of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board Chairman), “has disobeyed this Court’s decision in Haas v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 257 (2006),” by issuing Board Chairman’s Memorandum 01-06-24 (Sept. 21, 2006), which unilaterally imposes a stay upon all cases affected by the Court’s decision in Haas. Petition (Pet.) at 1. Although the petitioner argues that Board Chairman’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gardner v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Martin v. O'RourkeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Burris v. WilkieCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Nicholas Ribaudo v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Robert H. Gray v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2015
- Barney O. Padgett v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.