Legal Opinion

Jackson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1994No. 91-CF-1123PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Acting Chief Judge:

In this criminal commitment case, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for unconditional release or, in the alternative, for conditional release under D.C.Code § 24r-301(k) (1989). Specifically, appellant argues that he presented sufficient evidence at his hearing to show that (1) he does not suffer from a mental illness and (2) even if he does, his condition does not warrant indefinite hospitalization. Appellant also maintains that, under the proper legal standard for release of insanity acquittees, he was entitled to release as a matter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  5. Bethea v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WilderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Hinckley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Hinckley Jr., John WCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API