State v. J.S.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 J.S. appeals his involuntary civil commitment under chapter 71.05 RCW. He argues that (1) the trial court unconstitutionally denied his requests for a new attorney and to represent himself at his 90-day involuntary treatment hearing; (2) the State’s petition did not provide adequate notice and, thus, violated his procedural due process rights; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that he was “gravely disabled” and to justify committing him for 90 days. These arguments are technically moot because J.S. has completed his 90-day civil commitment.
Hunt, J.
¶2…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Detention of McGaryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In Re WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- In re G.G.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In Re Custody Of: D.r.k., Tracy Michelle Simms, Resp v. Daniel J. Simms, AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- In Re The Detention Of P.c. v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.