Legal Opinion

Rechler v. R. H. Macy & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCann, J.:

Claimant was employed by R. H. Macy & Co. On November 23, 1922, he fell from a ladder and struck his elbow on a shelf. The only question on this appeal is the failure to give notice as provided by section 18 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law which failure the employer, claims is prejudicial. The ground upon which the State Industrial Board excused the notice was that the employer provided medical aid and treatment within thirty days after the happening of such injury.

After the accident in question, the claimant continued to work until the 9th day of December, 1922, at which time he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Bloomfield v. . NovemberNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Claim of Prokopiak v. Buffalo Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Carbino v. DeGrasse Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Claim of Lawson v. Wallace & KeeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Claim of Lawson v. Wallace & KeeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frost v. Idaho Gold Dredging Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API