Legal Opinion

Mendiola v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 3, 1996No. 13-93-163-CRPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

Osear E. Mendiola appeals his conviction for murder, claiming error in the admission of his confession, use of a non-certified official interpreter, evidentiary rulings, argument by the State, and in the charge to the jury. We affirm.

Mendiola was convicted and sentenced by a jury to twenty years confinement for the murder of Javier Murillo Vidal. Vidal was shot in the jaw and the bullet continued through his neck, severely damaging his spinal cord and causing his death. Mendiola testified at trial and admitted shooting the victim, but claimed self-defense. Mendiola…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. South Carolina v. GathersSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Arthur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. Martins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  4. Shu Guo Kan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  5. Kanouse v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API