Legal Opinion

Compton v. Jesup

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 10, 1897No. 314PublishedCited by 11 opinions

CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. This case comes to this court on a certificate from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, propounding questions concerning which instructions . are asked, in accordance with section 6 of the act to establish Circuit Courts of Appeals, approved March 3, 1891. The statement of facts and questions are as follows: This is an appeal from that part' of a decree in a railroad mortgage…

Read the full summary

CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. This case comes to this court on a certificate from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, propounding questions concerning which instructions . are asked, in accordance with section 6 of the act to establish Circuit Courts of Appeals, approved March 3, 1891. The statement of facts and questions are as follows: This is an appeal from that part' of a decree in a railroad mortgage foreclosure suit, rendered by the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, which fixes the priority…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shiras

When by virtue of the decrees of. foreclosure in the several Circuit Courts of Ohio, Indiana and Illinois, entered March 23, 1889, the entire line in the_ three States was, on May 15, 1889, sold as a unit to the purchasing committee, and- when that committee organized a new company, called “The Wabash Railroad Company,” to which, on August 1, 1889, was conveyed the entire line so purchased, it would seem that all questions and disputes pending between the several mortgage trustees were settled and arranged upon the terms fixed by that decree. At all events, no appeal appears to have been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. HamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Central Trust Co. v. Grant Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. The " Stephen Morgan."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Minneapolis & St. LR Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  3. Adelbert College of Western Reserve University v. Wabash R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  4. In Re New York, S. & W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  5. Marshall v. LockheadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API