United States v. Garnett
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
A jury found Danny Garnett guilty of consumer product tampering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1365(a) and (g). The indictment alleged that, while employed by Dr. C. Kirven Ulmer as a physician’s assistant, Garnett removed approximately 450 hydrocodone tablets from 30 bottles and replaced them with other medications knowing that the substituted medication could and would be erroneously dispensed to patients for whom hydrocodone was intended. Garnett admitted to an Food & Drug Administration agent that he took the drugs for personal use.
18 U.S.C. § 1365(a) provides a penalty for “tamperfing]…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Itel Capital Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Cups Coal Company, Incorporated, a Corporation and Herman Mulvehill, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Lissette Christina NukidaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Constance F. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Gail M. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Capital Marine Supply, Inc. v. M/v Roland Thomas, Ii, Etc., Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. M/v Roland Thomas, Ii, Etc., Leonard Prejean, in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. v. Florida Mowing & Landscape Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. LamonsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Russell v. Perkins Ex Rel. International Management Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Baber v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.