Legal Opinion

State v. Heckman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1991No. 90-934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch,J.

Dissatisfied with (1) the trial court’s failure to give him credit for the time he spent in jail awaiting final disposition of his case involving three crimes and (2) the commencement date of the suspension of his driving privileges, Joel L. Heckman appeals to this court, complaining that his sentences are excessive.

We hold that Heckman should have received 6 days’ credit on his sentences and affirm the judgment of the trial court in all other respects.

A sentence imposed within the statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal unless the sentencing court has abused its discretion in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weimer v. AmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. LynchNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. GibbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Houska v. City of WahooNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. VrtiskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MeltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BanesNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. GroffNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. PhillipsNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. HunnelNebraska Supreme Court · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API