Lohmuller v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentMcCORMICK, Presiding Judge
I dissent to the refusal of the State’s petition for discretionary review. I would grant the State’s petition for discretionary review and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. In Geesa v. State, 820 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.Cr.App.1991), a majority of this Court held that an instruction defining reasonable doubt should be given in all cases, even in the absence of an objection or request. I would hold that a trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on beyond a reasonable doubt as prescribed by Geesa now constitutes a jury charge error and, accordingly, is sub*85ject to harm analysis under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Matchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Kieschnick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
- Boozer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.