Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lohmuller v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1997No. 854-96Published

1DissentMcCORMICK, Presiding Judge

I dissent to the refusal of the State’s petition for discretionary review. I would grant the State’s petition for discretionary review and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. In Geesa v. State, 820 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.Cr.App.1991), a majority of this Court held that an instruction defining reasonable doubt should be given in all cases, even in the absence of an objection or request. I would hold that a trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on beyond a reasonable doubt as prescribed by Geesa now constitutes a jury charge error and, accordingly, is sub*85ject to harm analysis under…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Matchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Kieschnick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
  5. Boozer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API