Legal Opinion

United States v. Salvador Vargas Navarro Samuel Pasqual Edmondson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1999No. 97-41162PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLITZ, Circuit Judge: *

Samuel Pasqual Edmondson and Salvador Vargas Navarro appeal their convictions for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and for possession thereof with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. For the reasons assigned, we affirm all convictions and the sentences of Navarro, but *230vacate and remand for the resentencing of Edmondson.

BACKGROUND

At about 2:00 a.m. on a morning in September 1996, a Sherman, Texas police officer stopped a car for failing to…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. United States v. Edwin Edwards Stephen Edwards Cecil Brown Andrew Martin Bobby JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Florita Bell Griffin, Terrence Bernard Roberts, Joe Lee WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Pitchford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. United States v. LucianoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Jose Efrain Ibarra CantellanoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API