Legal Opinion
United States v. Real Property & Premises Known as 90-23 201st Street
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2011No. 05-CV-5240 (ARR)(SMG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
ROSS, District Judge:
On November 16, 2005, the government filed an amended verified complaint in rem against various properties seeking civil forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881. On December 16, 2005, claimant Ronald Young (“claimant” or “Young”) filed a claim of interest in those properties. Although Young was represented at the time he filed his claim, he is currently proceeding pro se in this action. No other claim of interest has been filed in the properties, and the time to do so has expired. Presently before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment by the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phillips v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Carwell v. City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- U.S. v. TanguayDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017