Legal Opinion

Gail W. Davidson v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1988No. 88-1038PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Once again, the express terms of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), as interpreted by us in Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 1 require that we treat as ineffective a notice of appeal filed while a motion for a mistrial or new trial, albeit on only one issue in the case, was pending. That notice of appeal was a nullity, and no other notice was filed. We therefore lack jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal.

This is the sequence of events:

January 5, 1988: The district court entered final judgment on all claims.

January 12, 1988: Gail W. Davidson, the plaintiff-appellant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Alcorn County, Mississippi v. U.S. Interstate Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Clifford Craig v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Metallurgical Industries, Inc. v. Fourtek, Inc., a Corporation, and Irvin BielefeldtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. Anthony Ray Archer v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davids v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. Kenneth W. Treuter, and Maria B. Treuter v. Kaufman County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API