Legal Opinion
Adam v. Mount Pleasant Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 23, 1983No. 68514PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Justice.
In this appeal we revisit the misrepresentation exception in the Iowa Tort Claims Act, first addressed in Hubbard v. State, 163 N.W.2d 904 (Iowa 1969). Plaintiffs are farmers who lost grain when the Prairie Grain Company of Stockport went bankrupt. They brought the present action against the State and other parties in an effort to recover the value of their grain. They characterize their action against the State as a negligence claim based on breach of several duties owed them by the Iowa State Commerce Commission. In moving for summary judgment, the State characterized the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Block v. NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Wilson v. NepstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Hubbard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Adam v. Mt. Pleasant Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Vania Minor, Individually and as Mother, Natural Guardian and Next Best Friend of D.A. v. State of Iowa, Becky Grabe, Individually and Cleo Hester, IndividuallySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Callahan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Keller v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.