Legal Opinion

Blau v. Lamb

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 10, 1957PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is an action to recover short swing profits under section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b).

The several defendants were all holders of stock of Lamb Industries, Inc. Each of them exchanged this stock for convertible preferred stock of Air-Way Industries, Inc. Within six months thereafter each converted this preferred stock into common stock of Air-Way Industries, Inc. While it is conceded by plaintiff’s counsel that a major portion of plaintiff’s claim arises in this way plaintiff claims profits from some other more conventional transactions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Gratz v. ClaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Blau v. Mission Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. Truncale v. BlumbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  5. Alfred Pearson & Co. v. HayesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Zorn v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Blau v. LambCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. Blau v. LambCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Anderson v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Blau v. LambDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API