Legal Opinion

Emanuel v. Columbus Recreation & Parks Department

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1996No. 95APE12-1593PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Petree, Presiding Judge.

This matter is before this court upon the appeal of defendants, city of Columbus (“city”), James Barney, Wayne Roberts, and Susie Wells, as Director, Deputy Director, and Recreational Administrator, respectively, of the Columbus Recreation and Parks Department (“department”), from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas rendered in favor of plaintiff, Edward O. Emanuel, in a civil rights suit under Section 1983, Title 42, U.S.Code. On appeal, defendants raise the following three assignments of error:

“[I.] The lower court erred in holding that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Carol D. Patkus v. Sangamon-Cass Consortium, Sangamon County, Cass County, and Richard Austin, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tom Hammon v. Dhl Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API