In re the Claim of Bakal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 6, 1992, which, inter alia, assessed Trendata, Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions.
Trendata, Inc. is a marketing research corporation that utilizes telephone interviewers to conduct surveys for manufacturers of various consumer products. Claimant served as a telephone interviewer for Trendata for a period of time and thereafter applied for unemployment insurance benefits; claimant was initially ruled eligible to receive benefits based upon a determination that she was an employee of Trendata.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re Ted Is Back Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matter of Villa Maria Inst. of MusicNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- In re the Claims of MiddletownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re the Claim of SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re BaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re IannielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim MolinariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re BaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of BenjaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.