Legal Opinion

In re Sherin

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1926No. File No. 6145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORIARTY, C.

This proceedings was instituted in this court for the disbarment of A. Sherin, an attorney licensed to practice law in the courts of this state.

As there were no disputed questions of fact, the matter was heard by the court upon the motion of the Attorney General for judgment on the pleadings.

The facts as alleged by the original complaint, and admitted by the answer of the accused, are as follows;

About October, 1921, one Rudolph Miller retained a firm of attorneys at Aberdeen to bring suit against J. J. Batterton, A. O. Bunde, and Howard Babcock, all of Sisseton, S. D., to recover1…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re SHERINSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. In re SherinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API