Legal Opinion

United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 17, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2004-0798PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

On November 3, 2015, Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part the United States’ motion to compel Claimant Pavel Lazarenko to produce certain financial documents, including tax records, in connection with this in rem proceeding. See United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co., Ltd., 142 F.Supp.3d 37 (D.D.C. 2015) (“All Assets VII”). Claimant Lazarenko filed Objections to Magistrate Judge Harvey’s Memorandum Opinion and Order on November…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Food Lion, Incorporated v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio-Clc, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. Neuder v. Battelle Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  4. United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. All Funds on Deposit AtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  2. United States v. All Funds on Deposit AtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. United States v. Fifty-Three Virtual Currency AccountsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API