Legal Opinion

Michtom v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 22, 1978No. 253-76PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge

This case is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The parties have submitted a partial stipulation of facts. The question presented is the proper characterization to be given two losses incurred by the plaintiffs in 1970 and 1974 as a result of entering into a subordination agreement with Hayden Stone Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as Hayden Stone) and subsequently selling preferred stock of H. S. Equities, Inc., Hayden Stone’s successor. Having carefully considered the briefs and oral arguments presented, we find that the 1970 loss is *15properly characterized as an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Commissioner v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National-Standard Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. Joseph Lorch and Hannah Lorch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Michael T. Harges and Janet G. Harges v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
  4. Lorch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  5. Michtom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API