Legal Opinion

Barker v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1931No. Docket No. 4369PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

This is an action brought to recover damages arising out of the death of Claude W. Barker, through the negligence of defendants. The jury awarded plaintiffs (who are widow and children, respectively, of deceased) the sum of $30,000, and this appeal is prosecuted from the judgment.

The town of Kennett, Shasta County, is on the main railroad line of defendant Southern Pacific Company. From this town a branch track runs to a smelter which was formerly operated by United States Smelting, Refining and Mining Company. From this branch track a spur-track leads to a slag pit.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Williams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hoffman v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. O'Keefe v. South End Rowing ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  4. Smith v. American Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Citimortgage v. GironNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API