Burhans v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, six former employees of defendant Montgomery-Ward, .have brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§; 201-219, to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees. While originally alleged to have-been commenced by the six named plaintiffs for themselves and other employees similarly situated, later, by stipulation, the action was continued only on behalf of these six men.
Solely for the purposes of this litigation' both parties, waived a formal trial arid'submitted the controversy on a stipu*185…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Skidmore v. John J. Casale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Duncan v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ortiz v. Sucrs. de A. Mayol & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
- Ortiz v. Sucrs. de A. Mayol & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955