Legal Opinion
Skidmore v. John J. Casale, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 6, 1947No. 167, Docket 20465PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. The first question is whether the court below was correct in its con-elusion that the successful plaintiffs in this action were engaged in interstate commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Section 7 of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207, provides that overtime compensation must be given by an employer to “any of his employees who is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.” As it is conceded that the plaintiff-employees are not engaged in the production of goods, we limit our inquiry to the scope of the words “engaged in commerce.”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Higgins v. Carr Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Velasquez v. SAFI-G, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Luisa E. Silva v. Grant MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United Slate, Tile and Composition Roofers, Damp and Waterproof Workers Association, Local 307 v. G & M Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Divins v. Hazeltine Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Kelly v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.