Legal Opinion

City of New Albany v. Stallings

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1919No. 10,093PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Clark Circuit Court; James W. Fortune, ■ Judge. Action by Amelia Stallings, against tbe city of New Albany. From a judgment for plaintiff, tbe defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

— Action by appellee to recover damages alleged to -have been sustained by reason of a defective sidewalk. There was a verdict, and judgment in her favor for $1,650. Appellant’s contentions áre that tbe court erred in overruling its motion for a new trial for the reasons: (1) That the verdict *234is not sustained by sufficient evidence; and (2) that the damages are excessive.

Appellee while walking along the sidewalk on one of the public streets in the city of New Albany, in front of a grocery store, saw some beans displayed in front of the store, and, in turning and walking toward the store, she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Valparaiso v. SchwerdtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. City of Huntingburgh v. FirstIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Logansport v. GammillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Allied Coal & Material Co. v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API