Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Bell

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1902No. S.F. No. 2976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Motion to discharge writ of attachment. Defendants appeal from the order denying their motion. The complaint contains two counts: 1. Alleging that within two months before the commencement of the action plaintiffs sold and delivered to defendants certain mineral ores of the value of $25,000; and 2. That within the same time defendants received, and had,, to and for the use of plaintiffs, $25,000. The complaint was verified by one of plaintiffs’ attorneys, Mr. Soto, who also made affidavit that “the above-named defendants are all non-residents” of this state; averred the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Kennedy v. California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Asamen v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Jensen v. DorrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Rosenberg v. BullardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Heran v. ElmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API