Legal Opinion

Rose v. O'Reilly

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 18, 1992No. 50-88-05626; CA A72865Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs, the wife and daughter of the trustor, appeal an order appointing respondent O’Reilly as successor trustee of two testamentary trusts. They assign error to the probate court’s holding that daughter could not serve as trustee, because she was also a beneficiary of the same trusts. We reverse.

The trustor’s will named the daughter as the successor trustee. After the original trustees resigned, the probate court refused to appoint her. The sole reason given for disqualifying her was that the same person cannot be both a beneficiary and a trustee. Oregon case law is clear that a person…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morse v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. United Pacific Insurance Co. v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ORE.District Court, D. Oregon · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API