Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 612

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1960No. 6 Div. 771Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

2Per curiam

Counsel for appellant, in his brief in support of the application for rehearing urges that, “As the law on this point is presently interpreted, no person could use this proc^. ess without fear of being penalized because the change of circumstances subsequent to the date of the issuance of the bond.”

Damages recoverable under an injunc-. tion bond are compensatory, not penal, and as aptly put in Pierce v. Campbell, .217 Mo,. App. 179, 274 S.W. 875, 876, — “The principles upon which counsel fees are allowed upon dissolution of an injunction is based upon the fact that the defendant…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HowardMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Town of Dadeville v. WynnAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Pierce v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API