Legal Opinion
Cargill Inc. v. Veritas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 18, 1995No. 92 Civ. 5889 (JES)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Cargill Incorporated, Cargill International S.A., Andre and Cié S.A., Frahuil S.A., VandeMoortele,1 Paksoy Ticaret Ve Sa-nayia A.S., Madra Akin Yagcilik ve Saboncu-luk A.S. and Contimpex S.A. (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring the instant maritime action to recover monetary damages of $2.35 million. Defendant Bureau Veritas moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) on the basis that a classification society is not liable as an insurer of a vessel’s seaworthiness and that plaintiffs neither…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Sundance Cruises Corporation, Sci Cruises, Inc., Also Known as Sundance Cruises, Inc. v. The American Bureau of ShippingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Great American Insurance Company v. Bureau VeritasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Great American Insurance Company v. Bureau VeritasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Otto Candies, L.L.C. v. Nippon Kaiji Kyokai CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Eternity Shipping, Ltd., Eurocarriers, SaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Reino de España v. American Bureau of Shipping, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Otto Candies LLC v. Nippon Kaiji KyokaiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003