Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 9, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Henderson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hannah

Affirming.

This is a suit to enforce the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. The contract reads as-follows:

“Henderson, Kentucky, March 12, 1913. This agreement, entered into between R. R. Roberts, party of the first part, and Henry and Thos. Bennett, parties of the *589second part, witnesseth: We, Henry and Thos. Bennett, partiés of the second part, agree to pay to Roberts, party of the first part, seven thousand and five hundred dollars cash, and give him seven notes of $2,228.57, due January 1st of each year, beginning January 1, 1914,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bates v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Henderson v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  3. Brice v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Miller v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Blankenship v. SpencerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Long v. ReissCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Chaney v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  4. Swiss Oil Corp. v. Eastern Gulf Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  5. Henry Gray v. Frank StewartKentucky Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API